Arts are regarded as an indispensable part of every culture on the globe. However, over the years, there has been a decline in the number of people enjoying forms of arts as they tend to concentrate more on science, technology, and commerce. This essay will shed light on several factors leading to this phenomenon, as well as suggesting some effective measures in order to help people gain interest in arts.
To commence with, this phenomenon can be ascribed to the earnings potential available in the current market which can result in a stable career. It is indisputable that in the social and economic globalization era, more labor force is required in several economic fields such as modern technology, marketing, and biomimetics, to name a few. These occupations invariably offer a more substantial salary in comparison with careers in arts such as artists or songwriters. By way of illustration, in many developed nations, specifically the United States, software engineering is considered as one of the highest-paid occupations, whereas painters, composers, and other artists usually endure the lack of adequate subsistence and support. Another significant reason is that people living in this day and age have the propensity to prioritize monetary value over sentimental value. They regard money as an essential part of their lives and that it is more important than aesthetic passion, which predisposes many individuals, generally teenagers, to opt for a well-paid job rather than enthusiasm for arts.
However, there are several effective methods that can be implemented to evoke people’s fascination for arts. Firstly, it is important that the government invest in launching campaigns and workshops that present various aesthetic creations to the public so as to attract people’s attention and fondness for arts. This method can not only help people get themselves exposed to and gain a comprehensive insight into various forms of art that resonate with them, from traditional to modern ones, but also raise sufficient funds to support artists and artisans who are striving to preserve types of art. In addition, individuals who are artistically inclined ought to be encouraged to pursue their passion regardless of their backgrounds and living conditions. It is the national leaders that should take responsibility to accommodate the talented with adequate subsidies to ensure their well-being, as well as assisting them in exploiting their potential to the fullest.
In conclusion, in the modern age, fewer people derive enthusiasm and love from various types of art and they have the tendency to place more focus on business and technology; however, a number of methods can be applied to encourage people to gain interest in arts.
- These days a great number of children prefer spending time on computer games rather on sports Why Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Global warming is increasing day by day what are the causes of global warming and what can be done to eradicate this global problem 89
- Tourism is causing environmental problems all around the world What are the main causes of this What are some solutions 84
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rious aesthetic creations to the public so as to attract people’s attention and fondness...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36175115207 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02747879491 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55069124424 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8793870741 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.133333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22959363284 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758554494454 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562204403674 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154562279987 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420412350713 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...rious aesthetic creations to the public so as to attract people’s attention and fondness...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 434.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36175115207 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02747879491 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55069124424 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8793870741 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.133333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22959363284 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758554494454 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562204403674 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154562279987 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420412350713 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.