Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world. However, these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science, technology and business. Why do you think that is? What could be done to encourage more pe

In the past decades, the number of people applauding arts decreased significantly. In this essay, I will analyze the reasons behind this trend and also suggest possible ways to boost people’s interest in arts.

It is true that art enriches our culture, but artistic jobs are claimed to be impractical and unrealistic. While science and technology could improve human life through their inventions and new discoveries, arts only satisfy people mentally. Recently, material needs have risen increasingly as a result of population growth. Therefore people tend to value jobs which can provide physical products rather than spiritual welfare. In addition, arts learning might not promote a successful career. Obviously, artists often earn less money than scientists or businessmen. Besides, creativity, which is an erratic pattern, is considered the essence of arts. Hence artists are not guaranteed a permanent career if their creativity is stifled someday.

In order to enhance art industry, these potential ways should be taken. Firstly, creating job opportunity for artists by opening more museums and galleries where they can show and sell their works. Secondly, the government should give more patronage to support art study and awarding scholarships is a case in point. Finally, arts should be evaluated positively and their contribution to human culture ought to be recognized. For example, the artist who creates a masterpiece should be praised as when a scientist creating a new invention.

In conclusion, some major reasons why people lose their interest in arts can be identified, and some simple solutions should be adopted to encourage the development of art industry.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ingly as a result of population growth. Therefore people tend to value jobs which can pro...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ern, is considered the essence of arts. Hence artists are not guaranteed a permanent ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f their creativity is stifled someday. In order to enhance art industry, these ...
^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
... praised as when a scientist creating a new invention. In conclusion, some major reasons w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourage the development of art industry.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52307692308 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93695843554 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669230769231 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0160919793 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222843869567 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068475539283 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538644407567 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131659616404 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418770338664 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.