The average standard of people’s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that the people's health is more and more lower than in the future compared with people's health nowadays. l totally agree with this statement.
On the one hand, people nowadays are very busy with their work and family. Firstly, they sometime feel stress with their work but they can not live that they don't work. Most people work hard even overtime in order to earn money. So, they don't have much time to exercise such as play sports, do yoga or go to the gym. Secondly, a lot of family use the fast food and street food for their life. Although it's very convenient but fast food or street food are not good for health.
On the other hand, the environment is much worse day by day. The first reason is that the forest on the world continued fell in a few year ago and it will be continue decline in the next year later. If trees is chopped, the CO2 will be increase. Also, a lot of factory were built in order to serve people life but if the water waste and the garbage were not handled, it will be a source that will pollute the environment. That's why the average standard of people's will be lower. The second reason is that the vehicle of the world also increased on the world, especially in the big city.
In conclusion, although people in the word interested their health but a lot of factors will be decrease the average standard of people's health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | arahmanatik | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Sid_8 | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-06 | Chau Hoanh Khieu | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | annasin | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
It is argued that the peoples health is more and more lower than in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...ued that the peoples health is more and more lower than in the future compared with people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: L
... compared with peoples health nowadays. l totally agree with this statement. On ...
^
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ir work but they can not live that they dont work. Most people work hard even overti...
^^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ertime in order to earn money. So, they dont have much time to exercise such as play...
^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...urce that will pollute the environment. Thats why the average standard of peoples wil...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37647058824 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14533819497 2.80592935109 76% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541176470588 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1223760481 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255209570984 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901694567028 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102528763558 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191062447018 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11942118217 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.0946893788 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 50.2224549098 158% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 12.4159519038 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.