Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate regarding whether it is necessary for people to spare money for opening public libraries. Although a school of thought holds that this practice is useless and money-wasting, I would align myself with the opinion that conventional libraries ought to be maintained.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has convinced some experts to advocate the former perception. Firstly, in this modern civilization, numerous individuals are inclined to update themselves on information via the Internet. This is because technology enables them to get access to a wide range of news in a more time-saving and convenient way compared to other othordox methods. Therefore, news readers are able to acquire a thorough understanding of events happening around the world without lavishing time on commuting to libraties. Furthermore, the facilities of some libraries now have been dilapilated, which impedes these sites from being the best choice of many readers. This could be perfectly exemplified by the fact that some libraries in Ho Chi Minh city are not refurbished and installed air-conditioning systems. Thus, individuals tend not to go to public libraries.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications persuading me to concede that libraries should be maintained. The first reason stems from the fact that traditional libraries are places where books whose contents are verified deliberately are stored. For instance, the library of Vietnamese Education Ministry, located in the heart of Ho Chi Minh city, offers readers a great number of credible books written by prestigious authors such as Lenin or Stephen Hawking. By getting access to public libraries, those having passion for reading are capable of gaining true and reliable knowledge. Moreover, libraries create a conducive environment for studying and relaxing owing to the fact that most of public libraries are located in positions which are not affected by noise. Hence, quietness in these places can not only help individuals to relieve their tension and anxiety but also assist them in devoting more focus on learning.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that public libraries are not as prevalent as they were in the past as many people now prioritise to approach to news via the Internet; nevertheless, I want to assert that these sites need to be opened to statisfy the demands of many individuals. Besides that, from my perspective, it is much better for authorities to place more emphasis on enhancing the quality of public libraries.
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...raries. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling justifications persuading...
^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate a conducive environment for studying and relaxing owing to the fact that most...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30147058824 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02626807982 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585784313725 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8313246789 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.235294118 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117900645002 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366283663544 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268839029535 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747663285991 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181191997903 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.