It is true that a segment of individuals considers handwriting expertise as a minor skill due to advancements in cutting-edge technology, while others deem it an indispensable attribute. This essay examines both views with proper reasoning, supported by specific examples and evidence.
As modernization progresses, the way people carry out their activities changes. The first point that elucidates the diminishing importance of handwriting skills nowadays is the prevalence of software-based writing in office works. For example, most meetings now prefer presentations on Microsoft PowerPoint rather than plain paper. Similarly, there has been a significant increase in the usage of Microsoft Word for writing. Additionally, sophisticated writing can be generated with today's advanced tools like Artificial Intelligence, as seen in organizations referencing the idea and writing style from OpenAI's ChatGPT.
On the other hand, paper writing is still considered more secure and tangible than digital writing. It is extensively used in high-level work due to the security provided and the inability to be easily destroyed by unethical online activities. However, effective communication through paper writing requires excellent handwriting skills to ensure legibility. For instance, in court, all the culprit's statements are handwritten on paper rather than typed on a laptop or computer. Likewise, personal documents such as birth certificates and citizenship applications still require a person's handwritten signature. Additionally, top-level examinations typically require paper-based writing instead of digital methods. Thus, it is evident that proficiency in handwriting remains paramount.
While digitalization may overshadow paper writing, I firmly believe that handwriting skills are still an important and prominent feature. This is primarily due to the risk of data loss and the unreliability of digital writing compared to handwritten records. Furthermore, numerous official documents rely on handwriting as a means of verification.
In conclusion, although modern technology enables quick and visually appealing digital text, it comes with the threats of data loss and unreliability. Handwritten papers, on the other hand, provide a level of security and reliability that digital writing cannot match. Moreover, many examinations and office works still necessitate the use of paper-based writing. Therefore, adroit handwriting remains an essential skill.
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- Because of modern technology some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give your opinion based on your experience 73
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
... citizenship applications still require a persons handwritten signature. Additionally, to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10028653295 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3565424358 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618911174785 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3315830741 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.380952381 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.619047619 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216129799852 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635544932856 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605866929895 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12670209011 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252844997061 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.8 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.