It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives. Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages?
Taking risks is crucial for individuals in both public as well as private lives. The advantages of taking possible hazards are more significant than their disadvantages.
Taking risks can threaten both the person’s property and life. It also puts the organization’s reputation at a notch of a knife. For example, Kodak, a photo company filed bankruptcy after it took a risk to compete with other photo companies in 2012. The company was at a very big loss due to which the firm decided not to compete with others but rather give emphasis on their own products. Also, former WorldCom CEO Bernard Ebbers took a big personal risk in the early 2000s when he borrowed hundreds of millions of dollars to acquire stock in the business. When the accounting issue at WorldCom was revealed, the business declared bankruptcy, and Ebbers lost the majority of his personal fortune.
However, taking the risk will not always lead to bankruptcy and damage to personal and public properties but also make a person or organization at the top. There are several individuals or companies who benefitted after taking a risk. For instance, if Elon musk hadn’t taken a risk of investing in several companies like SpaceX, tesla, etc. he would not have become the richest person on the globe. Siddhartha Gautam (Gautam Buddha) is regarded as a god today because he risked his family and life. He would not have called to be a ‘Light of Asia’ if he hadn’t left his royal home and family. Also, if Apple company had not taken a risk of manufacturing gadgets using expensive materials, it would not have become the company with the highest revenue in the world. Due to such cases, taking risks is very important in both work and personal life.
In conclusion, taking a risk could be an effective and crucial way to succeed in both lives only after conducting a careful analysis of the risk-taking scenario. Careless risk-taking may bring haphazard and loss to the property and lives might have resulted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | maidiem1508 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | thaonguyen2k4 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | tohanhtrang | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- It is predicted that robots are going to become increasingly important in our lives How could robots be used in the future Will this development be a positive or a negative development 84
- Because of modern technology some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give your opinion based on your experience 73
- In some countries a high proportion of criminal acts are committed by teenagers Why has this happened what can be done to deal with this 89
- Because of modern technology some people believe that it is no longer necessary for people to learn handwriting skills but others believe that handwriting is still an important skill Discuss both views and give your opinion based on your experience 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... crucial for individuals in both public as well as private lives. The advantages of taking...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Gautam
...richest person on the globe. Siddhartha Gautam Gautam Buddha is regarded as a god today becau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91097922849 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69283869145 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537091988131 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4273333815 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9444444444 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367124231748 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126295107796 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101662845143 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254896911057 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738434515893 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.