The best way to deal with environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold the view that environmental issues can be best handled by higher costs of fuel. From my perspective, I disagree with the opinion because I believe it is not the best and there are more reasonable alternatives.
On the one hand, nowadays every house is having as many private vehicles as number of family members because people find it comfortable, time-saving by travelling in their own. This is one of the causes of traffic and pollution. However, it is so hard to them switch to use other travelling methods if the government issues the policy of increasing the price of fuel. Besides, this causes trigger disagreement and resentment among the public. To be more specific, what happens if staff’s salaries remain unchanged in spite of higher prices of gas. Consequently, this creates a burden on student’s budget or tight budget families so this policy would be counter-productive.
On the other hand, I think there are better solutions to tackle environmental problems. One of the solutions could be that the government should invest in public transports such as: buses, trains, subways and encourage residents to use them. It can be done by placing the guiding board along the roads and give a cheap price to support people. As a result, this leads to a reduction in the use of private vehicles and exhaust fumes. Secondly, governments must allocate resources to the development of alternative energy sources. They should spend more money on conducting research and developing technology to use renewable energy, such as wind and solar, biogas.
In conclusion, I think increasing the price of fuel is not effective and the government can invest their efforts on other solutions which are absolute essential activities to protect environment.
- The media should include more stories which report good news rather than bad news To what extent you agree or disagree 66
- The picture illustrates the university application process. 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 83
- TOPIC: Participation by 5 to 14-year-old in selected leisure activities (Australia) 56
- The charts below show the comparison of some kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20833333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0367397311 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4788829432 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13983640054 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438982028718 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533091586599 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102633707359 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584024011797 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.