The best way to Solve worlds environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
people often aruge that the most efective method to combat the global environment problem is by rising the cost of fuel such as disel and petrol.As excessive traffic and increasing pollurion are affecting every major city in the globe, this may help to some extent but I disagree that it is the best solution to this problem.
To begin with, the number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of the popoulation affluent enough to own cars. As a result, the raise in gas price could invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not drastically change their behaviour in using cars. For example: let us consider there is reduction in number of cars on road due to high cost, this doesnot solve the traffic problems.this type of policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs on currect and prospective car owners, and be detrimental to the economy of the nation. Therefore the final way out could be the construction of better roads and more effective use of public transportation facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that wase gas from cars is not the leading cause of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances into the atmosphere from the industries.As a result reduction in number of cars may not return us a blue sky and fresh air. we could better handle the problem if we could increase control over industrial waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and production equipments.
Finally, other measures like investing in renewable sources such as solar, wind and hydro power could be a better solution for example we are now able to invent the cell powered or even solar powered cars that are very healthy to the environment.
To put it in a conclusion, I pen down saying that, it is not a best way to control traffuc and pollution by increasing the gas price because such actions will hurt consumers and economy without achieving the aimed outcomes.measures such as construction of better transport facilities and development of new energy sources could help in minimizing the environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people often aruge that the most efective meth...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...e cost of fuel such as disel and petrol.As excessive traffic and increasing pollur...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...trimental to the economy of the nation. Therefore the final way out could be the construc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...into the atmosphere from the industries.As a result reduction in number of cars ma...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...not return us a blue sky and fresh air. we could better handle the problem if we c...
^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., wind and hydro power could be a better solution for example we are now able to ...
^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...sion, I pen down saying that, it is not a best way to control traffuc and polluti...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, even so, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84892611992 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57507082153 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.257436665 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.5 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.3 20.7667163134 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144923752039 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048315796794 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551778737713 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802257508216 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560708825076 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.