The best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum driving age from 18 to 23. To what extent do you agree?
The number of road accidents, especially caused by very young drivers, has recently been on the rise. Because of this, many are now suggesting that the age at which people start driving should be moved to 23. While this change could possibly reduce traffic incidents to a certain degree, in my view, other alternatives are far more effective.
There are some valid reasons why increasing the minimum age to get a driving licence can have a positive impact on road safety. The number-one reason is that as people age, they become more responsible for their actions. That is to say, they start thinking twice before they go over speed limits or break traffic rules Secondly, 23-year-olds are more emotionally stable than 18-year old people, which means they are less likely to be distracted while driving than their younger counterparts. Therefore, we can safely say that the policy proposed in question can lead to a reduction in road collisions.
Nevertheless, in opinion, other alternatives can provide better results in terms of road safety. One better option is to provide 16 to 18-year-old would-be drivers with better training. This training should include defensive driving skills, on-the-road training and at the end of the program, there should be an extended and strict test to ensure the quality of the training. A further solution that is more effective is to set maximum speeds for drivers under 23. The argument is that young drivers cause collisions since they cannot control their cars at high speeds. Thus, the alternative solutions mentioned above are more practical in real life.
In conclusion, despite reducing car accidents and their impact significantly, limiting the driving age to 23 is not the best way to improve safety on roads. Therefore, traffic safety authorities should look for other better solutions to address this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | ESSEYWRITER | 89 | view |
- Traditional ideas from older people about the way to live and behave are not helpful to young people and their futures To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing homework households in one country between 1920 and 2019
- The only way to improve safety in our roads is to give stricter punishments to driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
- Many of the products we buy nowadays break or wear out very quickly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this for manufacturers and the public 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...hould be moved to 23. While this change could possibly reduce traffic incidents to a certain d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should look for other better solutions to address this issue.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my view, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17549668874 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68638569989 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605960264901 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3153529774 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186946300966 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603395859724 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693737825041 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121240915983 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579037460272 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.