The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Nowadays, enviromental problems is becoming more severed and one major cause is the use of fossil fuels. To counter the problem, many governments decided to increase the cost of fuel. However, I believe that this is just a temporary and not a long – term solution.
It is undeniable that increasing the price of fuel has some effects on reducing the use of vehicles, thus, the exhaust emission. This has proven to be effective in some cities, reducing air pollution and also, congestion. With higher cost of fuel, people are more likely to turn to vehicles that use less fuel. As a result, manufacturers will invest more in the next generation of vehicles that is more fuel – efficient or consume no fuel at all, such as cars running on electricity. Consequently, this will accelerate greatly the development of alternative energies.
Nevertheless, I believe this measure is just a temporary solution. While people will use vehicles less often as the price goes up, the number of personal vehicles is increasing along with population growth. As a result, the amount of greenhouse gases will not drop as significantly as we need. In addition, vehicle is indispensable in many works, so theirs use is unlikely to reduced in those areas regardless the cost of fuel. For better solutions, we should invest more in the development of renewable energies as they are more reliable, enviromental – friendly and practically inexhaustible.
In conclusion, increasing the cost of fuel might be a quick and low –cost solution in short-term. However, there are better options for a good long –term solution for the fight against enviromental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | mohsina | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-22 | MagentaV | 67 | view |
| 2017-06-08 | lenguyenynhitk | 56 | view |
| 2017-01-24 | Binh_nguyen | 84 | view |
- In some countries, more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development ? 56
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12546125461 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02054709326 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7751824892 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137412679153 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529017197572 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680899012954 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962545802011 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320264749368 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.