The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
International experts have proposed many solutions to tackle global environmental issues. While raising fuel prices would be a useful measure to fight climate changes, I disagree that it would represent the best way to alleviate environmental problems.
National authorities should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. By adopting this policy, governments would certainly ensure that people used their cars less. Fewer car journeys would mean a reduction in exhaust emissions. This would have global consequences, slowing the process of global warming, as the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere was reduced. In terms of depletion of natural resources, world supplies of oil will not last forever, and by increasing petrol prices, there would be less dependence on fossil fuels. Thus, I believe that international bodies should exert pressure on countries to raise the cost of fuel.
However, I would argue that there are more effective ways to tackle international environmental problems. Firstly, from the perspective of transport policy, introducing restrictions on the use of private vehicles must be high on the government agenda in all countries. For example, the congestion charge on vehicles in London has improved the air quality. Secondly, government must allocate resources to the development of alternative energy resources to power motor vehicles and machinery in factory production. Finally, as part of wider effort to achieve sustainable development, international cooperation to share scientific knowledge and advances in technology should be a top priority. This range across issues such as the exploitation of renewable energy, marine conversation and the reclamation of arable land, halting the spread of deserts in places like sub-Saharan Africa.
In conclusion, although raising the cost of fuel would be a welcome measure, more effective steps are required to deal with a range of global environmental issues.
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- In some countries, more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development ? 56
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63389830508 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08807791719 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7452401509 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156579292196 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535510973219 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602861338872 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107376653617 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509765932978 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.