The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that the most effective approach to overcome environmental-related issues is to set a higher price of fuel. While I agree with this step as a policy, some methods should be taken into account so solve this problem.
On the one hand, it might be true that increasing fuel prices will discourage people from using private vehicles as it costs them a considerable amount of money. As people knew that transportation is the primary source of greenhouse emission harmful to the environment as well as people’s health, so when transport density in the street decrease, the number of exhaust gases will incline as well. Furthermore, people will prefer to use public transportation as the main transport since it is more economical than driving their motorcycle or car. This will reduce air pollution and increase the quality of air fresh as well as the life of people.
On the other hand, albeit, it can be said that this policy can solve not all environmental problem, there are many issues in our environment unrelated to fuel. Firstly, industries do illegal logging more and more for the sake of fulfilling the market’s needs. This phenomenon will cause some natural disasters such as floods and landslides, which might kill many people. Increasing the price of fuel will not profoundly influence the way people cutting down the trees. Secondly, it is about plastic-related problems. It seems impossible to me that such a policy can minimize the use of plastic. People will keep doing this although they realize that plastic is very harmful to our environment as it is hard to be absorbed and destroy the ecosystem, not only land animals but also water.
In conclusion, it seems that setting the higher price of fuel is the best step to tackle the problem of the environment; some issues are requiring special treatments and approaches such as illegal logging and plastic problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | rakasuraka | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | r.hojat | 84 | view |
- Some employers offer their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employer see no benefit in doing so 84
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05047318612 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93998185669 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5169246546 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231670123722 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764667009328 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625215327442 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152374932599 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586054389087 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.