The best way to solve the world's environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In recent decades, the governments and people being faced with several environmental problems. A significant of people believes that the main cause of this fact is the price of fuel. If the governments rise the price of fuel for consumers, the global environment will be protected. In the following paragraphs, I intend to dive into disagreement and write down some of my reasons and examples.
At first, by increasing the price of fuel, a lot of development projects will be failed incompletely. For example, oil-base organization that produced electricity will stop working; meanwhile, parallel interrupts will be happened in whole the country and finally make a serious and dangerous mess in the society. On the other hand, by closing companies, organizations, and even a lot of important, vital, and fuel-dependent industries such as transportation and machine-production industry, more than 30% of people will be unemployed. The jobless population, that be appeared by growing fuel value, try to make money from ground resources like natural forests, the seas, and the other accessible resources; therefore, it is the new treat for the environment.
By and large, the governments can protect from dumestic environment by some sample solutions. It is clear that words environment distructed by illegal hunters. The government should take care of national natures as wide as before. The best solution to protect from earth is search and find a fondamental alternative for fossilian fuels. For example, improving the equipments that change sunlight to electricity and provide devices to create clear fuel from sea waves, are two helpful and benefitful tasks instead of increasing the cost of fuel.
To put in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, the cost of fuel can not protect from earth planet. Human beings have no selectable option aspect replacing fossilian fuels with natural and recently-invited fuels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | rakasuraka | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | r.hojat | 84 | view |
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world- wide, we should be conce 56
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out It is pointless to try and keep them alive To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that overnments and individuals can tackle these problems. 56
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34105960265 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17577980769 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596026490066 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1681872902 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145409114193 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502189478025 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327337495719 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899400117399 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205954332583 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.