The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays environmental degradation is one of the most alarming issues that we are facing. It is believed that the problems related to the environment would be best tackled by inflating the price of petroleum. In my view, it is an inefficient solution and there are several reasonable alternatives.
Firstly, the inevitable demand for time efficiency and safe commuting in the modern world makes the change of fuel prices become rather insignificant, which proves the ineffectiveness of the suggested policy. In other words, even if the price were increased, people would still travel by their preferred form of transport on a daily basis and the problems of pollution would remain. For example, the gasoline price ratio in VietNam is very high compared to the world in 2017 (over 50%), but the level of environmental pollution still increases. This causes social disagreement and resentment.
On the other hand, this solution, albeit protective and preventive, is not the most effective way to address contamination. The major reason is that this solution can solve air pollution without any influences on other culprits also damaging environments such as intensive farming, overpopulation or the illegal disposal of waste from factories. Instead, each individual needs to live a greener and kinder life to the environment by classifying waste, using eco-friendly energy or simply walking more. The government should hold programs to raise people's awareness of the consequences of their actions on the surrounding environment and their future life so that they will take responsibility for their own actions.
In conclusion, I believe that heightening the price of fuel to address pollution problems is somewhat absurd and there is a number of other more suitable and effective solutions should be done.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sports 89
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities eg cost environment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39929328622 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09505136968 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621908127208 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8291407036 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102355659953 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345051253643 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288931305933 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627980669217 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213694556379 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.