The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Troubling environmental problems have required nations and individuals to come up with definitive solutions. Among them, increasing the cost of fuel has been touted as decisive, but this proposal has also divided people over its effectiveness. While there are reasons to support it, a rise in fuel price, in my opinion, is unlikely to be the most superior redress to humanity’s environmental woes.
Some might argue that making fuel cost more would meaningfully impact the environment. Firstly, raising the cost of fuel is believed to reduce carbon footprint through affecting the demand. If their means of powering up private vehicles become less affordable, people will have to resort to transportation alternatives which produce lower amounts of pollutants. The government , furthermore, can levy a tax on purchases of fuel in order to fund cleanup or conservation efforts. As done in many countries, this would ensure that the general population’s demand for energy can fund the restoration of pollution damage caused by fuel emissions. Essentially, making fuel more expensive provides a two-pronged approach to solving environmental issues.
Such a course of action is far from being optimal, however. This is because it can hinder economic activity and stymie development. When fuel becomes more expensive, transportation will follow, and businesses bear the brunt of this impact, which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. Undoubtedly, this is a catalyst for inflation and discontentment among the population. Meanwhile, there exist measures more efficacious than merely making fuel cost more, such as providing public grants and investing in initiatives and companies which produce environmental solutions. The power of technology and talented specialists, combined, can deliver clear-cut and decisive answers to the many issues plaguing the environment, without indiscriminately impacting the economy as previously described.
In conclusion, although increasing the cost of fuel is effective in certain respects, I wholeheartedly dispute the belief that it is the most superior remedy for environmental problems. Hopefully, better alternatives can be implemented to preserve the Earth for the sake of future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Vista cafe by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some believe that people will purchase a product based on their needs and advertising is not needed To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er amounts of pollutants. The government , furthermore, can levy a tax on purchase...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which causes them to raise the price of goods and services. Undoubtedly, this is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72321428571 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27857860257 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6904735931 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.117647059 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177828303692 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567971228374 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499187891005 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114135493739 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318558996852 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.