Car ownership has increased so rapidly over thirty years that many cities in the world are "one big traffic jam".
How true do you think this statement is?
What measure can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Owners of cars has extended too fastly over period of thirty years, that multitude cities all over the world, nowadays, there are congestion of cars on roads. To my mind, It is absolutely true and right statement about agglomeration of traffic transportation on the avenues in big cities. I opologize, that government should expand the streets and put modernizing traffic lights for controlling drivers. Uniquely, the using any kind of transportations injure people's health lifestyle.
Firstly, the present-day inhabitants of enormous towns are becoming purpose fighter for their own life and family. In the other side, people have been carrying out businness for puposes of profit, or buying modernized automobile such as Lexus, Cadillac CTS and Ferrari which will have been trend cars of the year. That is significant and convenient for them keeping their tendency and selfishness.
Secondly, there is another side of benefit having an automobile, the citizens of a big towns are displaced about crowded cars and traffic congestions, because they could not even get over the road undisturbedly. Needless to say about air pollution by motor vehicles, that man-made. It will influence to well-being of local inhabitants.
Consequently, the major aspect of discouraging using car should be expanded the roads as wider as the government could do for their partials. Also the administrations could construct some car field near to the avenue.
In my judgment, as I mentioned before, the roads should be expanded and rebuilded more car parking fields by the government, and even should care about the footpassangers. If there anybody has two or more cars could pay a tax for that kind pf persons. It will the best solution for local citizens.
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 78
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over thirty years that many cities in the world are one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measure can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 78
- some people think that capital punishment is an effective way to avoid serious crime do you agree or disagree 56
- 4 More and more people go on touring and travelling What are its advantages and disadvantages Give your own opinion 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'town'?
Suggestion: town
...ng an automobile, the citizens of a big towns are displaced about crowded cars and tr...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...government could do for their partials. Also the administrations could construct som...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24731182796 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9956139278 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3105908886 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217273999294 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642235344168 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570881599164 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118804362719 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684474292109 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.