The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B. However, due to its impact on the environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians, motorists and governments should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that the car is considered one of the most important types of transport among many people. However, some steps should be taken by drivers and government officials to reduce the use of this mode of transport, as it has some negative impacts on the environment and the public’s health. I agree with this point of view to some extent.
It is understandable why some believe that the car is the most convenient and popular way of commuting. Nowadays, cars have extremely grown in importance for both commuting and leisure purposes. Many people can use their own cars with no need to wait at bus stops and train stations because they can easily start their journey from their house’s door. In other words, with having a car, individuals not only can save their time to do their activities but also can have enough freedom to travel wherever and whenever they want. Additionally, during the threatening pandemics, car owners can better protect themselves and their families from infected people who use public transports. So, we have to accept that car is one of the modes of transport that the use of it cannot be too limited.
Despite the positive points mentioned above, the car can have some negative consequences. As people have become wealthier, the number of cars on the roads and streets has increased. This situation has led to increased injuries and deaths caused by traffic road accidents. In addition to this, many people and animals are in danger of air pollution created by the exhaust fuels from cars. I believe that according to these risks, it would be better for officials and motorists to address these negative outcomes. For example, governments have to encourage people to use public transports or even bicycles which are one of the environmentally friendly forms of transport. They can play an important role in the reduction of the use of cars if they try to improve public transport to such an extent that catching a bus or train becomes as convenient as travelling by car. Drivers can persuade themselves to car-share with others who make the same journey. In this way, they can also decrease their fuel costs which is a major drain on household incomes.
In conclusion, in my view, it is a good idea steps are taken into account to reduce the use of cars as long as there are other alternatives which can compensate for the convenience of cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-13 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | Dister | 84 | view |
| 2015-12-07 | vjtca28 | 80 | view |
| 2015-10-05 | AlexandraTz | 87 | view |
- People need to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think that the advantages of taking risks outweigh the advantages 67
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata 67
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 50
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1052, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is a major drain on household incomes. In conclusion, in my view, it is a good ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83170731707 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68972641685 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7685259789 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162317517738 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571519947905 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482248479492 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116245225688 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367918551944 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.