Characteristics of large and small families.
By the time, because of globalization structure of family has been changed. Many countries have implemented a one-child policy that has reduced the size of families. Parents have to consider whether it is better for their children to grow up in a large family or to grow up in a small family. Still, I believe there is no best family size. A large family and a small family both have their own advantages and disadvantages in the aspects of family’s finance and child companionship.
Living in a big family provides many opportunities for children to become more independent, realistic and regardful. In other words, large families allow children to develop their social skills. Children who have siblings are more social as they have to communicate with their siblings. In particular, children who are born into an environment of high expectations are more realistic and solitary as they have to care about someone. Furthermore, being brought up in large family also better for teaching children to be parents. For instance, they will not need some advice because they have experience of seeing how it is done.
On the other hand small families don't have issues related with finance and education. When in family one child it is easier to buy some clothes and other things which they need. They will not have any kind of problems with finance because of small number of people. Parents can afford their children everything they need. Moreover child can live in a beautiful life.
To conclude,there is no best standard of family because there are some benefits and drawbacks from both of sides. The atmosphere in big families is very motivated,at the same time small families have enough financial supply to carry a child without difficulties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-25 | BoyClazz | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | Mollymaul | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Siska Umila Adha | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- Due to the increasing density of living areas in a city, most residents are suffering from physical and social dangers. Consequently, they are against living in the city. 67
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 100
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 78
- The bar chart gives information about the number of library books borrowed from Lammertown Public Library in 1991 and 2001 and the pie chart gives information about the library's membership in 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...one. On the other hand small families dont have issues related with finance and ed...
^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...rd their children everything they need. Moreover child can live in a beautiful life. T...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
... live in a beautiful life. To conclude,there is no best standard of family because t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , at
...sphere in big families is very motivated,at the same time small families have enoug...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in particular, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03092783505 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80524790483 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9982078335 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118528003015 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406515528359 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482015000447 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077877109868 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475265460127 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.