Children are suggested to study from Televisions. However, some people agree that other sources can be the best media for them to learn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that TV is good for children learning because of the educational program. Meanwhile, others argue books are better than the former media because enhance creative thinking.
To begin with, Television has an ability to positively influence kids’ study due to the interactive channel. That is to say, when they access the educative shows by using this such a visual media, the new information is gained, broadening their horizons, with visualization to understand easily. For example, 7-year-old pupils watch Nat Geo Kids have a tendency to acknowledge plethora of new wild species entire the world, in addition to the video to recognize how those animals live in habitats. Although Televisions possess a well immense effect for kids to study, literatures do not provide knowledge only, but this can increase the creativity also.
Nevertheless, reading books bring more positivity for studying and increasing creative mind because this activity can stimulate the children’s brain nerve. This is caused by that this organ will process any words to process the recent information, then it sparks cells to imagine the horizons that have recited based on those such literatures. For instance, if children read an educational story such as The Turtle and Deer, it will match for primary school students due to blooming their imagination to know the story, being good for developing their knowledge, with additional information about many turtle and deer species globally.
In conclusion, the greatest merit is given by books instead of television, as the reason that kids taking two advantages, being creative and broadening horizons. Where possible, the literacy curiosity of youngsters should be nurtured since they have enrolled the primary school yet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...y, but this can increase the creativity also. Nevertheless, reading books bring mor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41304347826 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81026787781 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655797101449 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2107906569 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139150687106 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547622317637 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361871394403 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837618135544 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302814335335 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.