The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016.
The change in three various businesses in Great Britain with a presence of social media between 2012 and 2016 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the highest proportion was on large businesses. Meanwhile, the tiny those experienced an upward trend, and two others also increased with some changes.
Initially, there were more than three fifths of large businesses in the UK having social media presence, being the biggest. When it came to the medium and small ones, these figures had a percentage in about a third of the former. Furthermore, the aforementioned three figures tended to incline, with several fluctuations.
Eventually, the rate of the large businesses witnessed a slight growth to almost reach four in ten, remaining the largest, while there was an observation which that of the medium ones grew dramatically to exceed a half. Even though the rest showed an uplift trend, its proportion accounted for below two quarters, being the minimum data recorded.
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 84
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thers also increased with some changes. Initially, there were more than three fi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21118012422 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80837394901 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670807453416 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9700989775 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210651291714 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769525040669 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113429037857 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127984520353 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13568908592 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.