Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Given that watching TV is an effective channel for children to acquire knowledge, children as the audiences and learners should be encouraged to watch TV no matter they are at home or at school. While I disapprove of such statement.
On one hand, I suppose that the knowledge children can acquire in classes is limited, but with different contents of programs which could expand the scope of their knowledge. For example, a documentary about rare animals, not only can children have a great understanding of the animals, but also can instill the sense of protecting them. Besides, compared to boring teaching method, some quiz programs give children the feeling of participation which can ignite their enthusiasm for learning. Apart from these, watching TV at home can ease their pressure of study.
On the other hand, I hold that allowing children to watch TV regularly both at home and at school exerts negative effects on them. First of all, it is detrimental to physical health. Sitting on sofa and facing TV screen for long time bring about obesity and poor eyesight for children. Additionally, watching TV in school affects studies. Children could be absent-minded in classes, distracted by the pictures on TV. Moreover, if children were encouraged to watch TV regularly, they would become immersed in various TV programs, such as soap opera、talk show. They are reluctant to interact with their families、teachers, resulting in lacking interpersonal skills.
In conclusion, with the help of watching TV, children can acquire comprehensive knowledge but watching TV regularly also imposes negative influence on them. So we should not encourage children to spend much time on watching TV.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Oliviachenlu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable there are more beneficial ways to spend money To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o matter they are at home or at school. While I disapprove of such statement. On...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (TV) must be used with a third-person verb: 'screens'.
Suggestion: screens
...l health. Sitting on sofa and facing TV screen for long time bring about obesity and p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, apart from, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30147058824 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00815060254 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8656207255 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483589073135 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169103256775 0.084324248473 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148079392895 0.0667982634062 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33698967837 0.151304729494 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102112222383 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.