Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable, there are more beneficial ways to spend money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Large amounts of money have been spent on technology for space exploration programmes since several decades. Although i agree with that it makes sense to spend money on space exploration, the funds should also be allocated to other aspects like public services.
I suppose that space exploration is very likely to help human being to cope with shortage of resources and space. While there are several reasons why is unsound to pay more funds for space programmes. It is true that space programmes, including training astronauts and manufacturing spaceships come at huge costs to government, which is unaffordable to most countries. These are a waste of money in particular when the projects fail. In addition, the missions of space exploration in current world have gradually became an instrument to show governments’ power, leading those projects to vanity projects.
I believe that the massive amount of money should go to vital public services instead. Compared to space programmes, spending money on technology for public services is easier to make progress and gain achievements which have impact on everyone. For example, Intelligent Transportation System which can strengthen the connection between people、cars and roads is of great beneficial to ordinary people due to improving traffic congestions and saving time. Besides, sacrificing massive money and time to research technology for public services such as education、medical treatment and detection lifts people out of poverty, diseases and hazards. It gives people better quality of life.
In conclusion, my view is that the funds should be spent on services which can benefit most people in their daily life rather than space exploration, a project which is a waste of money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | Oliviachenlu | 61 | view |
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 50
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV Therefore they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...grammes since several decades. Although i agree with that it makes sense to spend...
^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...oration in current world have gradually became an instrument to show governments'...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, then, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in particular, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47252747253 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06658388482 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7529406305 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29310526009 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102499308494 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512934671966 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174751503256 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676160560764 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.