The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries
The bar chart illustrates how to dispose of the garbage in four different ways in Netherlands、Italy、Spain and the UK.
It is clear that the most frequent way of coping with garbage used by the UK、Italy and Spain is landfill. And the number in the UK is 60%, more than that of in Italy and Spain. The means of landfill takes up just about 5% in Netherlands.
However, the way of recycling in Netherlands occupies over 40% which ranks the first, followed by that of Italy. The percentage of recycled in Spain is the same as in the UK. The measure of burning garbage accounts for 40% in Netherlands, ranking the first among the four countries as well. And the figure is twice as much as that of in Italy and Spain. The proportion of biologically treated in Netherlands is about 10%, with UK following closely. The number in Italy and Spain is the same.
Overall, although the percentage of landfill in Netherlands ranks last in four countries, the rest of measurements rank first
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 70
- In many countries prison is the common solution to the problem of crime However another effective way is to provide people with better education so that they will not become criminals To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- Children can learn effectively from watching TV. Therefore, they should be encouraged to watch TV regularly both at home and at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78612716763 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1609566428 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50289017341 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.266441862 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.2727272727 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201028680346 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720199084808 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952304087273 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142243537916 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0977950435379 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.