Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies in school. What are the reasons? How can we solve this problem?
Nowadays, the issue of improving the teaching and learning quality at school is becoming a topic of public interest. One of the most prevalent problems is the difficulty of concentration of children, it acts as a precursor of finding some ways to improve the concentration ability of them. In this essay, I will demonstrate some reasons for creating this phenomenon before proposing some viable solutions.
It is said that there are dozens of reasons which make children be hard to pay attention to lessons, one of the main reasons is distractions. In reality, if a class has many students, there are many noises, which can be generated by other students' conversations, study tools, among others. These kinds of sounds make students unable to concentrate on doing some tests and listening to their teachers. Secondly, this issue can appear because of the boring teaching measures and lacking variety in the content of lessons. Moreover, teachers tend to give too many guides to their children, which is a major contributor to reduce the excitement of students. This matter can have an adverse bearing on the self-regulation of young children, which makes them become more distracted from the lessons in the future.
To solve this problem, there are several solutions that can be implemented to remedy the aforementioned issue. Firstly, teachers and educators can enact some silent regulations and punishments in class to mitigate the noise as much as they can. Secondly, the content exercises and teaching methods can be redesigned to enhance the interactions between teachers and students. Instead of giving the whole instructions, the teacher can give questions, offer some cues to encourage the children's curiosity. The more questions teachers give, the more concentration children create to find the results. This solution is also a vital determinant to not only avoiding over-guiding actions of teachers in class but also stimulating the enthusiasm in the learning process of students.
In conclusion, I am totally convinced that the whole society has to do some attempts altogether to change the traditional teaching methods, due to waking the instinct of exploring abilities, avoiding distractions at school.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33903133903 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01486429907 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0920382695 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274579087311 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846021168913 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491501356237 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141552619337 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684200888311 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33903133903 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01486429907 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566951566952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0920382695 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274579087311 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846021168913 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491501356237 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141552619337 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684200888311 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.