Children should focus on studying or listen to music, do some activities while studying. discuss both views and give your own opinion
Education for children has become the topic of great debate in this rapidly changing world. While there is a considerable body of opinion which holds that children are supposed to concentrate on studying, some argue that enjoying music or doing other activities while studying is greater. Although both methods have their own advantages as well, I am more convinced of the second viewpoint.
On the one hand, what draws much of my attention in the suggestion to devote to learning is the better academic performance of children. Needless to say, more study time is inevitable when children pay attention to it. In the event of this, they are likely to hold firmly the basics, which is the premise for learning more things. This makes it possible for children to achieve extensive and deep intellectuality. For the most part, children’s learning outcomes are greatly contributed by concentrating.
On the other hand, easier absorbing knowledge is worth considering in the second method. Obviously, doing something else offers children a golden chance to reduce fatigue. Thanks to this, they are capable of being freed from stress and relaxed, implicating the motivation for studying. This leads to the fact that there is likelihood for them to generate more great ideas. Given these points, children are able to absorb knowledge with ease.
From my perspective, I side with those who support doing other activities since children are inclined to be in a good mood. It is widely known that having some music or doing others is synonymous with taking part in many extracurriculars. During this process, children are prone to be active, this results in their confidence and shiningness to spread positive energy to everyone around. With this in mind, lots of love and respectation are given to them. Eventually, this probably gives rise to the happiness of children, which is the reason for my choice.
All in all, it seems to me that learning should go hand in hand with entertainment like some music or some other activities. It is advisable that people take this essay into great consideration as a point of reference.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 84
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07428571429 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83713566392 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6826548678 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207925598215 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582292440971 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722231755222 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12234127894 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829039313332 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.