Children today are too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastimes than spending all day indoors. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Write an essay about 250 words to express your opinion.
In today's digital age, children are undoubtedly exposed to a plethora of electronic entertainment options that can easily captivate their attention. From video games to social media platforms, the allure of technology is undeniable. However, the question arises: are children too dependent on computers and electronic entertainment? In my opinion, while it is important for children to strike a balance between indoor and outdoor activities, there are numerous benefits to be gained from engaging with technology.
Firstly, it is crucial to acknowledge that technology has become an integral part of our lives. The ability to navigate digital platforms and utilize technological tools is essential for success in the modern world. By allowing children access to computers and electronic entertainment under appropriate supervision, we enable them to develop crucial digital literacy skills that will prove invaluable in their future endeavors.
Moreover, it would be unfair to dismiss the potential educational benefits that technology offers. With interactive learning apps and online resources readily available, children have access to a wealth of knowledge at their fingertips. These tools can enhance their understanding of various subjects and foster a love for learning in an engaging manner.
That being said, it is equally important for children to engage in physical activities and traditional pastimes. Sports not only promote physical fitness but also instill valuable lessons such as teamwork, discipline, and perseverance. Outdoor play allows children to explore their surroundings, develop social skills through interaction with peers, and appreciate nature.
In conclusion, while I agree that excessive dependence on computers and electronic entertainment can have negative consequences for children's overall well-being if left unchecked; completely shunning these technologies would be impractical in today's interconnected world. Striking a balance between indoor technological engagement and outdoor activities is key. By providing opportunities for both virtual exploration and physical playtime, we can ensure that our children grow up well-rounded individuals equipped with the necessary skills needed for success in the 21st century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | aicungduoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | aicungduoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | tuanmanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | masonmount | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | maiphuozngot | 56 | view |
- Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success at school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- Classmates are a more important influence than parents on a child s success at school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many people suppose that teachers play an important role in education Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people suppose that teachers play an important role in education Do you agree or disagree 84
- Many people suppose that teachers play an important role in education Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an engaging manner" with adverb for "engaging"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...subjects and foster a love for learning in an engaging manner. That being said, it is equally impo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02167182663 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17729426433 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600619195046 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1506231986 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26109621452 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826627516869 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686209779658 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143307010745 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05431077644 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.