Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amount of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought by wealthy parents

There is an assumption that children from poor families are to deal with challenging situations of adult life more successfully rather than those who grew in wealthy environment though expected to have more considerable odds to achieve their goals in life. Furthermore, the representatives of lower class are claimed to find jobs earlier, help the parents more and have the ideas of their own. Even if they can’t go on to higher education, these people are known for higher creativity and desirability for money. This essay will discuss whether these children are more prepared for adult life or not.

Firstly, without parents' support an individual comes to know what responsibility is at their earliest convenience.This knowledge is absolutely crucial for prosperous future life. Being used to managing themselves from the very childhood, they are able to easily make plans, wake up at dawn and never be late. Even if such a person has to struggle to cope with a problem, they could with no hesitation find the solution. This is because their life is perfectly structured. Moreover, poor children are eager to earn money than wealthy ones. For example, football and basketball players brought up in poor conditions are highly motivated to work hard from day to day in order to have a better life. Self-motivation is an indispensable feature needed for fruitful dealing with troubles, while laziness destroys everything.

From the other hand, this is not always true because offsprings of rich families get more attention and care from parents. As a result, they do feel more secure. They are also provided with better education which is necessary for adult life, as well. Nowadays, after graduating from university studying where requires a substantial amount of money former students have impressive chances to be hired on a generous salary. Subsequently, they have stability in their career and no need to be afraid of failures in life.

Taking into consideration all the mentioned above, children who are brought up in less wealthy families have higher motivation and practically no lower prospectives for the future success. The experience that have helps to deal with problems. At the same time, children that have richer parents get better education and have a stable career which guarantees them fewer troubles in adult life.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o have more considerable odds to achieve their goals in life. Furthermore, the re...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...bility is at their earliest convenience.This knowledge is absolutely crucial for pro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ging themselves from the very childhood, they are able to easily make plans, wake...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re able to easily make plans, wake up at dawn and never be late. Even if such a p...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er be late. Even if such a person has to struggle to cope with a problem, they c...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Even if such a person has to struggle to cope with a problem, they could with ...
^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oys everything. From the other hand, this is not always true because offsprin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for example, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2037037037 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85348703011 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0103214745 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.526315789 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384176458917 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105405325497 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749062229347 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239767953468 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801295004756 0.056905535591 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.