The number of men and women in further education in Britain

The bar chart gives information on the number of men and women in Britain who continued their education in colleges after leaving school. The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. As can be seen, it also shows whether the people chose to study part-time or full-time. Overall, the figures of females climbed slowly for both types of further education whereas with men there was only a steady change for the better in full-time education.

If we look at the diagram, it becomes evident that part-time education predominated in all the three periods regardless of the gender of the students. Additionally, in the early seventies neither women nor men tended to pick full-time education. However, the indicator suggested a slight increase in number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders being occupied in full-time education in the nineties compared to fewer than a hundred of them at the beginning of the seventies.

Surprisingly, the number of men in part-time education declined moderately in the years 1980/81 in comparison with the earlier period.

As for the gender factor, it is stated that in years 1970/71 the number of female students was significantly paltrier than the one of males, especially in part-time education. This trend changed through years, so in the years 1990/91 the number of women in further education even exceeded the number of men.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037908604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7768648107 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341289803459 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017482334 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137329405259 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227432490175 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606979589963 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The data concern three periods of time - the years 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91. ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number from period to period, it leading to about 500 students of both genders be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74037908604 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7768648107 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341289803459 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017482334 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137329405259 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227432490175 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606979589963 0.0819641961636 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.