Companies and other organization are requiring their employees to wear a uniform. Some people believe that this brings a positive impact while others disagree with this notion. Discuss both views and give your opinion
While wearing a uniform can improve company’s brands, the require of that in such companies and institutions might decrease fashion creativity for some people.
A notion is believed that wearing a uniform creates their branding in society. When employees wear the uniform, other people can see about brand of the office, making them have well memorize about such office brand in their minds. For instance, Bank Mandiri, one of stated-owned enterprises, have regulation for their employees to wear uniform in the form of dark blue long shirts with logo, making people know right away about such Bank when they see someone wearing the shirts. If the companies have stronger images, it will easier for them to attract their new customer in the future. However, in my opinion, branding is not only determined by wearing a uniform.
In contrast, from the employee point of view, the regulation to wear uniform will decrease creativity in term of fashion. While fashion always changes from year to year, wearing a uniform makes people have no chance to realize their concept about fashion trends. For example, evidence says that local government employees in Mojokerto, a city in Indonesia, have less fashion creativity when attending parties due to having habit to wear a uniform on their daily activities, compared to entrepreneur. The decrease of fashion creativity might affect in fashion industry, tending to stagnancy and it will be old fashion in the future. Therefore, giving chance to employee to determine their shirts worn in the office is a right choice.
In conclusion, although wearing a uniform not only can increase companies’ identity, such regulation might decrease fashion of creativity for some people. To compromise, it is suggested for companies to require wearing uniform in a day, and giving free fashion in another day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...a uniform can improve company’s brands, the require of that in such companies and instituti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'memorized'.
Suggestion: memorized
...nd of the office, making them have well memorize about such office brand in their minds....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6922218683 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488215488215 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.382560146 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241450657225 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107111619051 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487877003094 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161875294437 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307465222413 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.