Companies should provide sports facilities(physical acitivites to have a healthy well-beings) for local communities. To what extent do you agree?
In contemporary society, the concept of corporate social responsibility has gained significant attention in terms of a company's strategic development and stability. Many individuals argue that companies should allocate a portion of their budget to support sports facilities within the community. Personally, I am inclined to partially agree with this notion.
On the one hand, one of the key reasons why companies should invest their funds in advancing sports facilities is to enhance their brand reputation within society. By prominently displaying their logo or brand name in sports facilities, these companies can capture the attention of their target customers, leaving a lasting impression and creating a sense of responsibility towards the community. Consequently, companies can seize valuable opportunities to become a household name in the community. For instance, Vingroup, a reputable real estate corporation in Vietnam, consistently focuses on developing the exterior of their residential projects, incorporating various sports facilities. This approach not only demonstrates their commitment to promoting the health and well-being of their customers, but also enables them to engage with potential customers in the future.
On the other hand, there are more compelling reasons why I firmly believe that the responsibility of providing public sports facilities lies with the government and other non-governmental organizations. Relying solely on a company's budget to support sports facilities would be impractical, as it would not cater to the demands of all citizens in society. This is precisely why authorities should implement policies that allocate national funds towards the construction of sports spaces with comprehensive facilities, thereby improving community health. For instance, the Vietnamese government has prioritized the development of public parks with sports facilities as a primary strategy in building metropolises such as HCMC and Hanoi, aiming to enhance societal health and overall development.
In conclusion, while it is important for companies to contribute to the improvement of sports facilities in order to enhance societal health and attract customers, I firmly believe that the responsibility and investment in these aspects should primarily lie with the authorities and policy makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and the globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 55
- Some people think that video games are advantageous while others believe video games are harmful to the people who play them Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90532544379 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30915275102 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529585798817 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7634914636 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.538461538 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207254245019 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768998122155 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348380712786 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133539936608 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205857061827 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.