Companies should provide sports facilities(physical acitivites to have a healthy well-beings) for local communities. To what extent do you agree?
In contemporary society, there has been a significant increase in corporate social responsibility among organizations, which helps people have better well-being. A prevailing belief stated that it is necessary for firms to facilitate sports materials for the public. While this idea is valid to some extent, I disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, the promotion of companies' brand names is considered one of the compelling reasons. Due to the popularity of access to physical activities amongst the community, people nowadays are frequent visitors in the space having sports equipment to serve their health needs. If the company facilitates sports equipment having brand-name or logos on them in specific areas, the individuals surrounding theirs will have an indelible impression of their brand name and the companies easily become household names among the community. To exemplify this view, it is well-known that big private organizations in Vietnam almost concentrate on investing equipment in building complexes in which residents are captivated to engage in physical activities.
On the other hand, although private companies gain benefits when paying money on sports facilities, I believe that states and individuals should raise funds for these purposes too. Due to these being quite exorbitant, consequently, residents are not provided adequate equipment by companies Therefore, both government, citizens along with private organizations should invest money in these amenities in order to equip enough for dwellers who consider that sports are one of the great contributors to improving people's physical health as well as mental health.
In conclusion, despite the merit that the proliferation of a particular company’s brand name if only companies invest money in facilities for physical activities, I believe that the public as well as the government should pay attention too, which helps encourage the awareness of public health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extent do you agree 56
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 67
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 67
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 535, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...rs to improving peoples physical health as well as mental health. In conclusion, despit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6813559322 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04427540721 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.3631008764 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.6 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24375043851 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906415509034 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436674590354 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147675726494 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242797580606 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.