Companies should provide sports facilities(physical acitivites to have a healthy well-beings) for local communities. To what extent do you agree?
In contemporary society, corporate social responsibility is paid attention in the company’s strategy stability development. Many people believe that companies should allocate their budget in supporting sports facilities in the community. Personally, I partially agree with this idea.
On the one hand, one of the reasons why companies should spend their money in advancing sports facilities is to promote their brand name in society. Because of the continual appearance of the logo or brand name in sport facilities, these companies could gain the attention of the target’s customers which left a deep inside the customer's memories about the company fulfilling responsibility. As a result, companies could seize valuable opportunities in becoming a household brand name in the community. For example, Vingroup with the reputable real estate corporation in Vietnam always focuses on developing their exterior in their residence projects full of sports facilities. This is considered as the best method not only in showing their interest in taking care of their customer’s health but also in accessing their potential customers in the future.
On the other hand, there are more compelling reasons why I firmly believe that the government and other non-government organizations should take more action in providing public sport facilities in their community. Obviously, relying solely on a company’s budget in supporting sports facilities would not be feasible because it would not be served for all demand’s citizen in the whole society. This is the reason why the authorities should have more policies in allocating their national budget in building sports space with more facilities in improving community health. For instance, public parks with sports space are considered as the primary developing strategy in building metropolises in two big cities like HCMC or Hanoi of the Vietnamese government in improving society health and stability development as well.
In conclusion, although companies should take action in supporting sports facilities in enhancing society health due to attracting their customers, I believe that the authorities and policy makers should focus and invest in these aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- 11
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drink that has been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that culture will be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only way of protecting a culture Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mproving community health. For instance, public parks with sports space are consi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65868263473 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0342092005 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511976047904 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8306034745 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.384615385 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218640281928 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845521839688 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487326197653 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142927898376 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402111068619 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.