As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the question of whether computers can substitute for teachers or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although computers bring a number of merits in education, the teacher’s role should not be underestimated.
There are a number of reasons why teachers should dominate class rather than computers. First, since just teachers, not the computers, have enough educational command to guide students, they cannot be marginalized. In fact, teachers are more flexible than a machine in answering all questions or confusion of students, especially unusual or unprecedented questions, thus helping them gain a better understanding of any topics taught. Seconds, by conducting a variety of activities in class, teachers can assist students to enhance their social skills. This means that through the presentation, discussion activities, teachers can foster soft skills of learners, such as communication skills or logical thinking ability, which is conducive to students’ cognitive development.
However, the presence of a teacher is essential for students because human contact influences them in positive ways. First, in order to create a role model of a good personality for children, an exemplary teacher is always the best choice. In fact, students should realize that instead of dealing with a machine, they are directly contacting with a human being who deserves their attention and respect, which is more effective to educate children and complete their manner. Second, by relying on their student’s learning process and level of understanding, teachers could make a sufficient and effective curriculum and the teaching robot is unlikely to carry every student one-by-one like a human being. For example, in the same classroom, students with differences either knowledge or social background would be tied to a slow advance in their studies because of others’ incapacity of understanding, which requires a suitable teaching method from a teacher more than a computer.
In conclusion, a teacher plays an important and irreplaceable role in the classroom. By using computers as a multifunctional supporter, teaching at school could be easier and operative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Jass Ramgarhia | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | M dios | 100 | view |
| 2014-08-23 | lrana32 | 80 | view |
| 2014-02-22 | Lê Kim Kiều Anh | 80 | view |
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree? 100
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at the store Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching another planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent years, the question of whether computers can substitute for teachers o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62388059701 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21709623349 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605970149254 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7378639909 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250693578742 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887869231517 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585308489254 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170801336467 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490437372356 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.