In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching another planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In recent years, space projects to find extraterrestrial life have been receiving a great deal of public attention from the community. Although these programs may appear attractive, the downsides will be significant.
There are compelling reasons why the programs that look for new planets like the Earth will be meaningless. First, since the cost of space projects is prohibitively expensive, many countries will fail to pay them in the long run. In fact, it will cost millions of dollars for the crew, researchers, and scientists involved in this field, leading to budget deficits as an unexpected result. Second, by making space travel to discover the same terrain as the earth, many people responded that the chance of success is very slim. For example, it takes hundreds of millions of years to bring people to the nearest planets, like Mars, but there is no guarantee that there is life, not to mention the life expectancy of people is limited, which implies that such schemes will offer little returns.
In addition, the human is the deciding factor whether or not to look for a new planet. First, in order to guarantee that life will be continuous on a new planet, human has to change their own awareness. In fact, even if people could find out the second Earth with abundant resources and ecosystem likes the beginning, human with a terrible consciousness still endlessly destroy the new one by excessively exploiting and devastating. Second, by focusing on solving the recent problems involved in our environment such as ozone depletion, deforestation, environment contamination, …, nations could together recover the Earth instead of dodging the destruction of the Earth and beginning the ravage of a new planet. For example, countries should promulgate strict and deterrent laws about protecting the environment, which is more beneficial to our planet than looking for a new world because of human’s benefit.
In conclusion, space projects to find extraterrestrial life may have lots of risky drawbacks. By applying suitable methods and deterrent laws, people could avoid environmental destruction as well as retain the natural balance of the ecosystem.
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? 78
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certainplaces so mobile phones should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 89
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching another planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 89
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at the store Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ition, the human is the deciding factor whether or not to look for a new planet. First, in ord...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, second, so, still, well, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26436781609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96855075177 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8660707945 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121439455853 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400840067819 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280579499984 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595217513833 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433960792047 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.