As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, computers are becoming increasingly common in our life. This device has a lot of useful functions which can help to make our life easier, for example in understanding another country’s language. Some people argue it is waste of time for people to learn foreign languages since computers can translate fast and correctly. I disagree with the statement and I believe it is essential for people to learn foreign languages.
Firstly, computers are manmade machines so there are possibilities of errors to occur which could lead to incorrect conclusions. For example, slang words are becoming more and more popular around the world, especially with the young generation. However, it is quite hard for a computer to understand these words exactly since they are changing and increasing in number every day, so learning is the only way to understand slang words. Secondly, computers cannot be used to translate while communicating. It’s become odd to look at a smartphone or computer screen over time to know the meaning while listening which could affect the situation adversely.
Furthermore, there are various reasons why people should learn foreign languages instead of depending on artificial intelligence. A lot of studies have shown that learning a new language could booster our brain function. For instance, a person who is bilinguals tends to remember longer than a person who only knows one language. In addition, knowing multiple languages increases the value of the person because position levels in a company usually require language certification. Therefore, if someone wants to achieve success in their career, knowing more than one language is necessary.
In conclusion, although there are undoubted benefits from using computers to translate, learning foreign languages still plays a vital role for people to succeed in their career or to boost our m
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: increasing
...rds exactly since they are changing and increasing in number every day, so learning is the only way ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34797297297 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88707092158 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4762327489 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.533333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218805463948 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774925321886 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068289442667 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135907637697 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411336760716 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.