contention is well-grounded and it is necessary to analyze the driving force behind this predisposition.
Nowadays the mass media seems to prioritize men’s sport shows and devote a restricted amount of their coverage to sporting events of the opposite gender. There is a perception that it is a prejudice against women and runs counter to gender equality in today’s society. From my perspective, this contention is well-grounded and it is necessary to analyze the driving force behind this predisposition.
One primary reason is that spectators of female sporting shows account for a significantly higher proportion than their female counterparts. This means that men’s sports programmes generate more television royalties for broadcast channels due to their high audience ratings. For example, televising a men’s football match during prime time of Premier league help media channels make a handsome profit because of its global reputation. In contrast, broadcasting matches of the opposite sex with lower popularity is likely to put these media corporations at risk of going bankrupt since there will undoubtedly be less broadcasting contracts for them. As a consequence, it is not surprising that TV channels show a preference for male sports matches.
Despite the arguments mentioned-above, it is my opinion that more showtime should be given to the broadcast of women’s sports events. At present, professional females athletes generally receive much lower remuneration than sportsmen. This is because their sports club do not not have easy access to sponsorship and advertising contracts when the frequency of their matches on the air face time constraints. Thus, more TV coverage should be given to female sports shows, which could directly boost their currency, thereby enlarging female sportswomen’s monthly compensation. In this modern society where increasing emphasis is placed on gender equality, a modification on preferences of TV channels could make a contribution towards this objective.
From the above-mentioned arguments, while a partiality for male sports shows is an inevitable inclination because of their lucrative nature, an increased consideration for women is a pressing need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-24 | hungnguyen123 | 84 | view |
- The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015
- The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world 78
- The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015 61
- Overall there are 12 stages in the coffee manufacturing process beginning with how coffee beans are produced and ending at the packing stage
- This method will ensure that the next generation will be healthier and will not have such health problems 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...n. This is because their sports club do not not have easy access to sponsorship and adv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66037735849 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21587893105 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8061716444 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127598383987 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591239620275 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172676795568 0.0667982634062 259% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984896882824 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137582147787 0.056905535591 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.