Since earth resources are scarce, and only a limited number of people live in dignity without facing poverty or famines. Decreasing reproduction rates in overcrowded countries like China, India may improve whole countries life standard.
In the beginning of this century, the development of a country mainly relied on its industrial revolution which is parallel to labour force. To achieve this many countries promoted reproduction, so called “generation boom” to increase their population that can join the workforce. But this reproductive politics get out of control in some countries like china and india, moreover, technology re-shaped industries, and with this new revolution, less manpower is needed. This leads to unemployment, poverty, under education, which puts the following generations into a viscous cycle. To break this circle, decreasing reproduction, promoting birth control and educating people on it would be beneficial.
In addition to this, those population who is unemployed and uneducated, disturbs the social welfare of the whole population. There are increased diseases, crime, and pollution.
On the other hand in some of the developed countries like Japan, opposite scenario is valid, namely: aging. The young people in japan are so busy with their jobs, are mostly depressed and burnt out, so that they don't marry and reproduce. This in turn puts the total society in danger, in fact a research showed that in year 2050 almost 2 out of 3 people in japan will be more than 65 years old. So the labour force is decreased so much that they can not supply the whole country. There are some European countries with similar risks about future population distribution.
To sum up, although over-population can lead to unemployment, poverty, and crime and threatens social well being, aging of a country can be as worrisome as over-population if not planned properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... countries like China, India may improve whole countries life standard. In th...
^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...es like China, India may improve whole countries life standard. In the beginning of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprove whole countries life standard. In the beginning of this century, the de...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting people on it would be beneficial. In addition to this, those population wh...
^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this population' or 'those populations'?
Suggestion: this population; those populations
...be beneficial. In addition to this, those population who is unemployed and uneducated, distu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... and pollution. On the other hand in some of the developed countries like Japan, opposit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y depressed and burnt out, so that they dont marry and reproduce. This in turn puts ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver-population if not planned properly.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, in fact, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39130434783 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0251016378 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2334406622 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.466666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186585928653 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577705973104 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454592212329 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091284256481 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431768638477 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.