Whether we look at the physical aspects, or psychological manner, it is true that women and men have differences. On the other hand i don’t believe that this is a necessity to restrain them to do a particular profession.
It is a fact that there are some professions which has dominated by one gender. An example to this can be kindergarten or primary school teaching, which are mainly chosen by women. Although this seems normal, a recent study surveyed in Australia showed that, boys in kindergarten or primary school are struggling to find themselves a role model. In fact the Australian government put some measures to encourage males to work in kindergarten or primary school as teachers.
Another example can be seen among military personnel, where men constitute the vast majority. Women rarely choose to be a soldier. Many people think that being a soldier is all about physical strength. But this is another bias, which has proven to be wrong, in wars in the last decade. Actually physical strength is only one aspect of being soldier, in fact it is even not the major one. Due to recent technological advances, the most important skills that a soldier has to have, are analyzing the problems and managing the condition, which can be done by women as good as man.
To conclude, although there are certain beliefs, that some jobs have to done by one gender, there is no scientific evidence or rationale behind this. Moreover, some studies showed that, working with an opposite gender usually increases productivity. Instead of excluding people from some jobs, we should encourage people to choose, whichever field they want to work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgarten or primary school as teachers. Another example can be seen among milita...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, moreover, so, as to, in fact, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00362318841 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77696769326 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7638711539 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145873268924 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485975365258 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342819681774 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807800702466 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170382923866 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.