Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As the acceleration of global trade, products are now becoming easily able to be imported and exported transcontinentally that people in all over the world can apparently approach some exotic goods from many nations. Hold my perspectives, this situation could bring more fruitful outcomes than drawbacks.
From my perception, one of the most significant feasible approaches is the deletion of national boundary. It is interesting to note that, with the international business, This concept would bring more important value for country's development and sustainability as well as promoting economic and selling demand from nation to nation. For instances, when the government in particular country opens boundary for trading purposes, many products from others countries will be imported into this country as a result of creating their own country to become a competitive trading market. Thus, economic and service also boost and reach to a lucrative policy. Further, with a variety of external products, citizen expand more choice to buy and improve their overall knowledge of the globalized market. Predictable, citizens are likely to emulate the social trend and being more modernised.
In stark contrast, however, an inadvertent obstacle which has taken into consideration is the decline of natural identity in traditional products. For example, Living in an active trading market, people will omit their national goods to follow the international trend. Probably, this is because cultural goods have little efficiency than modern products. Chronologically, The replacement of country-based goods will soon appear to some up-to-date products. Therefore, Some appropriate policies could be imposed by governments to protect their cultural identity from products.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my attitude about the global trade is an effective way of stimulating the economy and development in many countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | shiny jaya ratna | 65 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | vdnguyen3012 | 73 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 89
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opens'' or 'open's'?
Suggestion: opens'; open's
...en the government in particular country opens boundary for trading purposes, many pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in particular, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6955017301 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12119549665 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622837370242 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6372546147 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179719371451 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542566263463 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455723099528 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969043084558 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682647194744 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.