Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development?

It is true that globalization has increased among the countries. Due to burgeon in technology, people are able to buy similar electronics, buy branded apparels, constructing similar buildings and development of easy transportation. Though cost of living varies from country to country, people can easily access for varieties of items across the world. People can buy all international products while staying at home and this is possible because of huge growth in globalization. For example, AUDI cars are manufactured in Germany, but Indians buy the cars without travelling to Germany. This shows how well countries are developed. The advancement in globalization has increased the competition between country to county due to which its leads to a positive development. Countries started their focus on introducing multilevel organizations, developing cities with unique ideas, increase in job opportunities, constructing humongous buildings and planning place for exquisite gardens.

During past, Journey from one country to another country was difficult and trading of products was a risky task. But due to development in communications, easy accessed Transportations and rapid increase in technology helped the future generations to have an easy access. Countries started thinking plethora options for developing their cities to attract the tourist and generate economy which helps for their country expansion. Due to tourism, there will be increase in jobs, expansion of businesses, increase of revenue, maintaining the quality of the products and exploring different cultures. Hence, I conclude that countries being similar in all ways which made life far luxurious when compared to past.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...y helped the future generations to have an easy access. Countries started thinking plethora op...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, well, while, for example, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74206349206 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20403765097 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626984126984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1297752694 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224645403232 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735763186398 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056079753162 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175650280594 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583402542924 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.