Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo

Essay topics:

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Many doctors believe that, by constructing the number of a sports complex, public health will be fostered. In stark contrast, nevertheless, some vary greatly from this consumption that it has limited benefit on public health and others approaches are predicted. Aiming in this essay, I would outline 2 major significance of two perspectives as well as giving my own opinion on it.

On the side of building more sports facilities, from my perception, the physical health of citizen is a prominent outcome for this notion. Having practised enough workout routine, people will develop their overall strength or durability and flexibility as well. For example, doing some active sports such as soccer or basketball, people will get lean easily and their respiratory system will be improved while running. Further, attending on sports location also helps people for stimulating a higher strength of spirit. Accordingly, after an hour to hour stressing on workplace or school, people presumably find some gyms or sports stations for reducing tension, for example. Consequently, many fruitful outcomes could appear to this notion. Nonetheless, the construction of an ever-expanding sports places would contribute a large sum of money from governments. Thus, a detailed plan for this development could be taken into consideration.

On the side of protesting this notion, sports stadium will be beneficial for those who are normal people and have none disability profile. For instance, some football fields and tennis courts are probably not suitable for disabled people. So that, government continue thinking about building a sports complex for disabilities. Accordingly, it will absolutely cause more money. Besides, other solutions could possibly dedicate to care about the health of citizen such as free checking health monthly or curing diseases for impoverished people from a charity organisation. Due to insufficient money, many sub-standard people are not able to afford the aliment treatment cost and lead to the exacerbation of their health. Thus, this situation would cause a deterioration of the overall public health.

In conclusion, I strongly affirm that building more sports accommodations and conducting others measures should be tackled by governments in a parallelly way for providing the best healthcare system to dwellers.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-19 Amila Priynatha 67 view
2019-12-05 Leeinho 89 view
2019-11-27 MHT 73 view
2019-11-06 Gholamirayaneh 73 view
2019-11-01 junjunh 78 view
Essays by user joshleyas :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...se more money. Besides, other solutions could possibly dedicate to care about the health of ci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('parallelly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...res should be tackled by governments in a parallelly way for providing the best healthcare syste...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56582633053 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0435124334 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3073742687 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.578947368 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52631578947 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241034013219 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767388445944 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535581241851 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15887030817 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499889262391 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.