Countries are now becoming same and same due to same products are now available every where.
Do you think this is positive or negative trend?
Globalisation has been dramatically increasing for last two decades. In consequence, every commodity or product is now easily available at any part of the world, and thus there are few differences between our native country and foreign nations. I totally agree that this is a positive trend, and in these following paragraphs I shall discuss my view.
First and foremost, if we see in the past, it is clear that there were very less communication among two countries. Therefore, when people visit or migrate to another place or nation, they feel some sense of isolation due to absence of their regular commodities in which they are accustomed. Nowadays, it is indeed true that most of the products have become ubiquitous and thereby people can use and enjoy them everywhere. For instance, many people are fond if their local food and luckily those foods are available in lots of places.
More-over, when it comes to preserve our culture and traditions, indigenous products play a crucial role. For example, Indian ancients invented and made many products during their life, and it was necessary to make them popular among world to conserve it very effectively and make India as a well-known nation in entire world. It is thus very clear that why sharing products and things are important in this world.
In contrast, of course it is true that by sharing things, there has not been any personal identity left for many countries. Take an example of shampoo. Shampoo was invented in India; however, large proportion in this world does not know this truth.
In conclusion, despite this negative effect, I believe that availability of various product in many part of the world is good for the entire world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny part of the world, and thus there are few differences between our native count...
^^
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun part seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parts'.
Suggestion: many parts
...that availability of various product in many part of the world is good for the entire wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99300699301 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66606958611 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7296283236 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137402780848 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435421677967 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442352118446 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794065908514 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477230157501 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.