Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children.
What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
It is irrefutable that children are the policy makers of tomorrow. A large group of thinkers has thought that government should take a responsibility to spend some amount of its budget to pay one of the parents to take care of their children. This essay shall discuss the tremendous benefits and several untoward repercussions of this phenomenon.
Perhaps, the main advantage is that after spending enormous time with parents, children will be able to absorb conventions and codes of conducts. This will help to convert a child into a responsible citizen of the society. Moreover, parents are regarded as role models by their offsprings and thus, teenagers can acquire immense knowledge related to their culture and tradition. Finally, some vitally important life lessons can be taught to children by their parents. For instance, it can often be seen that parents establish some ground rules to develop several essential virtues and temperament in their pupils.
On the downside, authorities would have to pay a huge amount of money to every family, and therefore, it is possible that due to dearth of finance, administration may not be able focus on other important areas such as education and healthcare properly. Furthermore, if bureaucrats allocate such a large proportion of money, it would be of paramount importance for parents to keep in touch with their children all the time which means that a child will not be able to learn freely; conversely, pupils may be more able to learn when they are not supervised. Many children, for example, gain various pivotal skills such as cooperation and how to live an independent life from their fellow peers. Therefore, it is clear that this aspect has disadvantages too.
To recapitulate, it appears to me that although numerous merits stem out if government pay money to at least one parent, some negative effects will also be generated which cannot be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12420382166 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87127124243 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2675970422 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.769230769 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303576496947 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103230094893 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491069476214 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183214169072 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036408430132 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.