As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the envrionment?
he private car ownership has increased dramatically across the globe, mainly because of an enormous rise in the living standard and a great leap in technological innovation. I would argue that increasing car ownership has a greater positive effect on individuals although some envrionmental impact cars may produce.
Owing a car allows people to visit a wider variety places conveniently and efficiently,thus improving people’s living standard. Driving a car enables people to go out at anytime they wish. This means people would be more likely to travel farther in search of a good restauant, a well-equipped theatre, a shopping center with a wider selection range, or even to have journey without being bound to fixed schedules provided by public transport. By expanding activity scope and experiencing more, people would feel more satisfied about their life.
Another benefit of increasing car ownership is to boost efficiency, and saves people more time for quality life. Compared with taking public transport which is time-consuming and can only take people to spots nearby intended destinations, driving a car can take people directly to destinations to ran errands, and make it possible to complete more tasks in a day or thus spare people more time to develop personal interests, have quality time with family and enjoy leisure activites.
On the other hand, as people enjoy benefits brought by car, the envrionmental problem becomes a thorny issue. An increasing number of private cars mean more consumption of fuel sources in the form of oil, and more greehnouse gas emissions, one of the main contributors to global warming. However, governments have already taken appropriate course of actions including funding companies to produce electric cars, limiting car use by issuing license plate rule, and compensating private owners to encourage them to switch to energy-efficient cars to alleviate strain on envrionment.
In conclusion, private car users can be benefited in terms of exploring more best possible places and having more free time although envrionmental pollution cannot be ignored. However, several viable solutions adopted by governments can help to reduce the impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-19 | Frank Chen | 89 | view |
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- Many people believe that the main aim of university education is to help graduates find better jobs, while some people believe that a university education has wider benefits for individuals and society as a whole. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he private car ownership has increased dra...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , thus
...iety places conveniently and efficiently,thus improving people's living standard...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'journeyed'.
Suggestion: journeyed
... wider selection range, or even to have journey without being bound to fixed schedules ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... feel more satisfied about their life. Another benefit of increasing car owners...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'best' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: best
... can be benefited in terms of exploring more best possible places and having more free ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'more the best'.
Suggestion: more the best
... can be benefited in terms of exploring more best possible places and having more free ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47076023392 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05083997749 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625730994152 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4471011831 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.923076923 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18729003521 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691293701326 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566234924235 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973169192791 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053789381141 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.