A country should spend money on skills training or vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree

University education is considered to be hierarchy among the various educational fields. However, some opine that government should invest more on skill training or vocational training to encourage practical work flow. I do not agree with the former statement, the below essay will discuss why investing in university education is a better investment.

To begin with, the contemporary society has always known how imperative education is. In addition to, having special skill sets that can only be achieved by going through university education, the morels of life can be learned. For instance, doctors have to go through 5 years of medical school to get a degree. Not only do they learn about how human body works and how to treat it, but also important life lessons like patience, virtue, socializing just by interacting with various patients. Furthermore, the modern world has come to realization how important university education is, thereby, they are more likely to be highly paid for their work. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic illustrated how pivotal it is to find a vaccine. Consequently, the demand for university graduates with high medical skill set increased.

On the contrary, investing on skill training could in theory satisfy the practical workflow of the country. Many developed countries, do lack in man power for construction and other physically demanding occupations. Therefore, by investing more on vocational training and skill training, would yield more capable individuals to satisfy the required man power. However, in my opinion, cutting the finance off from universities to full fill the practical demand is redundant. Nevertheless, a country does require both university graduates as well as skilled workers to function independently.

To conclude, Although, many countries are in need of man power, cutting budget down from universities to full fill the demand else where would hamper the workflow balance. Hence, i am of the opinion that government should strike a balance between the two.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...versity education is a better investment To begin with the contemporary society h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... does require both university graduates as well as skilled workers to function independent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...killed workers to function independently To conclude Although many countries are ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...would hamper the workflow balance Hence i am of the opinion that government shoul...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28075709779 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83861194251 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567823343849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 317.0 20.2975951904 1562% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1674.0 106.682146367 1569% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 317.0 20.7667163134 1526% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 190.0 7.06120827912 2691% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315945651975 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.315945651975 0.084324248473 375% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187111380352 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966338890093 0.056905535591 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.9 13.0946893788 1236% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -258.74 50.2224549098 -515% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.1 11.3001002004 1134% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.82 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.39 8.58950901804 272% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 63.0 9.78957915832 644% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.8 10.1190380762 1273% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 129.0 10.7795591182 1197% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.