The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve a crime Do you agree or disagree

Along with the advancement of technology, the number of high-tech surveilling devices is rising which is believed to be the major cause of the decline of crime proportion. In my opinion, these aids undoubtedly support crime detection, nevertheless, it is required more components to help cut the crime rate.
Indubitably, security technology has done a remarkable leap since the first camera was innovated. In the past the only way police could possibly use is following the suspect, desperately hoping to find a hint which leads to the evidence. This old-fashioned way not only takes a numerous of time but only could not assure the accuracy whether that is the defendant. For instance, in antique times, a crime was judged by witnesses or credible objects and that had played a significant role in one of the most well-known cases which were wrongly condemned in Vietnamese history-The Le Chi Vien case.
Due to the fact that cameras and other devices have done an excellent job, the fall of crime percentage depends on dozen of reasons. The first to be told have to be people's consciousness since that is the source of crimes. When greed, jealousy, hatred,…come ahead, people would commit crimes. For example, stealing often starts when someone could not control themselves from other’s possessions, they desired to use them for personal purposes. Therefore, educating awareness is accounted for the decrease of this proportion. The second reason to be seen is how authorities act with illegal actions. If they do nothing but give advice, irrefutably, no one will have the fear of justice. On the contrary, promulgating strict laws will construct the consciousness of citizens about crimes.
In conclusion, advanced aids indeed have played an inevitable role in security, otherwise, the two major reasons that lead to the fall of crime proportion contemporary is people awareness and authorities intervention.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...components to help cut the crime rate. Indubitably, security technology has don...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ovated. In the past the only way police could possibly use is following the suspect, desperate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etnamese history-The Le Chi Vien case. Due to the fact that cameras and other d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... of crimes. When greed, jealousy, hatred,…come ahead, people would commit crimes. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsciousness of citizens about crimes. In conclusion, advanced aids indeed have...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25407166124 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01089985495 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1134769754 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165931087672 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454775097907 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475653725506 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10149503991 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532242105051 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...components to help cut the crime rate. Indubitably, security technology has don...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ovated. In the past the only way police could possibly use is following the suspect, desperate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etnamese history-The Le Chi Vien case. Due to the fact that cameras and other d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... of crimes. When greed, jealousy, hatred,…come ahead, people would commit crimes. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsciousness of citizens about crimes. In conclusion, advanced aids indeed have...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25407166124 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01089985495 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1134769754 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165931087672 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454775097907 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475653725506 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10149503991 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532242105051 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.