Cultures and traditions change from generation to generation. Why does this happen? What can be done to change it?
That our deep-seated cultures and customs have changed between generations appears to be profoundly recognized. In a family, the lessened connection between members and the omission of the young towards those values leads to that circumstance. Several approaches can be taken to figure it out.
Undeniably, cultural and traditional values are passed down by the senior generation to their junior ones. When they remain their strong kinship in a family, grandchildren are able to approach stories and practices related to invaluable traditions and customs. However, these days, the young and their grandparents seem to form an unseen gap which has hindered them from understanding each other and building up their close-knit relationship. For this reason, variety of lessons in term of cultures cannot be transferred properly and effortlessly. Additionally, many youngsters consider those values old-fashioned, therefore, they choose to ignore or discard those implementations. Compared to their senior who are familiar with many cultural practices, they have a preference for some more trendy and enjoyable activities.
In order to improve this phenomenal, all of us must join hands. Parents, in a family, should be a bridge between two other generations because they can help to strengthen the family connection. For example, parents can hold regular family reunions where the young can listen to the old in the family. Thanks to those events, such quintessence can be inherited to some extent. Moreover, the press should pen more articles and stories to unravel and emphasize our entrenched values which call for some concern from the young to preserve them.
To sum up, we face the difference of how each generation reckon about our precious cultures and traditions. Regarding preservation of those cultural and conventional treasure, it is indispensable to know the causes in advance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-25 | gianggiangvn | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | Arun Kumar | 89 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 84
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 84
- NOWADAYS FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS BEHAVE VIOLENTLY WHAT IS THE CAUSE AND HOW DO WE SOLVE IT 11
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47945205479 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07024320202 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1958970492 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232623121818 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738369703561 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640836441072 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138595305336 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350704684517 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.