Cyclists and car drivers today share the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What can be done do to reduce these problems?
It is true that bicycles and cars sharing a mutual road increases chances of accidents. While this is a serious issue, there are measures which can be implemented to mitigate the dangers.
The major problem is the high likelihood of collisions on streets which are used by both cyclists and car drivers. Though cyclists are sometimes responsible for causing accidents when they do not abide by the traffic rules, in the majority of cases, car drivers tend to draw troubles with higher velocity and limit in the overview of the surroundings behind a layer of metals and glasses. For example, car drivers may not leave enough room when they overtake cyclists, or they may turn left or right without realising that this could put a cyclist at risk. Countless accidents have been attributed to smaller vehicles falling in the blind spot of massive ones. Such accidents frequently result in grave injuries, especially to cyclists who are particularly vulnerable, even when wearing a helmet for head protection.
In order to reduce the number of road accidents as well as death tolls, national and local authorities across the world have adopted two general types of policies. First and foremost, many governments have prioritised expenditure on constructing dedicated cycle lanes on busy boulevards. They also have invested in transport infrastructure by upgrading and expanding public transport provision. Secondly, authorities have introduced restrictions on car drivers. London, for instance, has imposed a congestion charge to discourage cars and motorbikes from entering the city centre. Traffic calming in cities and installing speed cameras also make the roads safer for cyclists.
In conclusion, calamitous crashes may happen when two-wheeled vehicles using the same lane as four-wheeled ones, steps can be taken to alleviate this matter.
- Housing areas with taller buildings or building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In many counties more and more women have full time jobs as men There is a logic that they should share the housework equally with men To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The internet means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38408304498 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88346389819 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4362607562 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172355654759 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507007906864 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448202041895 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918993101995 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365180689148 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.