Dealing with environment issues such as global warming is the job of governments and
international organizations. There is nothing individuals can do. How far do you agree?
At the age of economic boom, our lifestyle has taken a high toll on the environment posing a threat to our health and habitats. While it is viewed to be a task for the authorities and international organizations by somebody, it is believed that each takes responsibility for overcoming this problem. Thisessayjustifiesmyapprovalofthe second idea.
Firstly, it can be seen that ecological issues mainly stem from the unconscious actions of people. There are numerous kinds of problems people are facing now such as global warming and rising sea levels. These all are the repercussions citizens are feeling due to a great number of activities contaminating the environment. For example, rising global temperatures is a phenomenon when harmful greenhouse gases from exhaust fumes prevent heat from escaping, and as a result, our planet is getting warmer. Moreover, marine pollution is a consequence of dumping untreated sewage and waste from factories and people, not to mention Formula enterprise in Vietnam in 2017 discharged wastewater into the sea causing mass fish deaths. Therefore, the repercussions from individuals should be dealt with by themselves.
Secondly, it cannot be efficient if there are only governments and international organizations finding the solution without the contribution of citizens. We cannot look forward to measures of the authorities and organizations as well as campaigns of the environmentalists as they are not radical and just tackle a part, not the root cause of ecological problems. While the government is trying to resolve the catastrophe to protect our environment, the citizens do not raise their awareness and continue to catch a habit of destroying the ecology and habitats, for example, deforestation, using pesticides, and genetically modified crops. This contrary makes our globe still become severe and disastrous without being green and environmentally friendly.
On the other hand, it might be contended that the environmental problems that today's world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Therefore, governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. Nevertheless, it is worth pointing that although the government and environmental groups can come out with proposals and invest money, they can not control the activities of people. For instance, they cannot prevent strictly the citizens from using plastic bags and throwing them away without recycling as well as using public transport to minimize the exhaust fumes. Hence, I remain opposed to the idea that Governments, environmentalists, and large organizations are the only ones curbing environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-24 | khanhlinhvg | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- Dealing with environment issues such as global warming is the job of governments and international organizations There is nothing individuals can do How far do you agree 78
- Some people believe that going to university or college after high school is a must for young people to be better prepared for the world today Others disagree saying that young people should spend their time learning from real life experiences after they 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75555555556 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.90663526824 2.80592935109 211% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56049382716 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6174490794 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.117647059 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3529411765 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162797763764 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479436786398 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366607844839 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889442013271 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216008316656 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.