Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste ?
In the age of economic boom, people adopt consumerism lifestyles, which leads to a significant increase in household waste. Some people assume that new legislation is the only way to deal with the insufficient amount of domestic waste recycled. This essay partially advocates this statement.
On the one hand, making waste recycling compulsory brings a benefit to the problems of waste from households. When a law is enacted, citizens will be law-abiding, pay more attention, and make it into more serious consideration. If people violate the law, they may be fined, punished, and sentenced to imprisonment. Therefore, by imposing sanctions, rewards, and punishments, the government can promote people to take responsibility for classifying and recycling rubbish in a mandatory way. This will help people make a habit of categorizing recyclable garbage to protect our environment.
On the other hand, I believe that introducing a law to force people to recycle is not the sole measure as education is also an alternative method to contribute to the increase in recycling. For example, at school, teachers should teach students about different kinds of refuse and how to classify them as well as negative impacts they may bring if they are not disposed of properly, especially. Therefore, categorizing recyclable waste can be an assignment that students do at home to preserve our environment. Moreover, there should be some campaigns made monthly by activists to raise public awareness of recycling. To encourage everyone to recycle, we can organize numerous activities to instruct them to do some items from recycling waste such as pencil pots, flowerpots and give presents.
In conclusion, making recycling a legal requirement is indeed an effective way. However, it is not the only feasible measure to increase the amount of domestic waste that is recycled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Dealing with environment issues such as global warming is the job of governments and international organizations There is nothing individuals can do How far do you agree 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- Some people believe that going to university or college after high school is a must for young people to be better prepared for the world today Others disagree saying that young people should spend their time learning from real life experiences after they 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 470, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a mandatory way" with adverb for "mandatory"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y for classifying and recycling rubbish in a mandatory way. This will help people make a habit of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent is indeed an effective way. However, it is not the only feasible measure to i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34013605442 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11674519431 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4946532584 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446919375064 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133146024536 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747104051868 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256188200154 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833511845224 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.